ROSRA Analysis

New Report
Data Input Block

Enter required information below

-

Within-Country OSR Frontier (Peer SNGs)

Compare against domestic peer subnational governments

Select a country and subnational government to view OSR frontier analysis

1
Gap Analysis
2
Prioritization
3
Overview Selection
4
Recommendations
Entry of required information + Processed Metrics

For proper execution of the analysis, you are required to complete only the cells shaded in gray and in bold.

= Registered × (Revenue to Date / Billed Amount)
$
$
$
$
$
= Billed Amount - Outstanding Amount
Useful Average Values required for the Analysis
$
$
%
$
$
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Ratios
0%
Revenue to Date / Billed Amount
0%
Registered Properties / Estimated Properties
0%
Total Fiscal Base / Total Market Value
Graphical Representation of Analyzed Data
Property Tax Gap Analysis - Dashboard
# of Properties
Estimated
0
Registered
0
Compliant
0
Coverage Gap
$ 0
Mixed Gap (Unreg.)
$ 0
Compliance Gap
$ 0
Mixed Gap (Reg.)
$ 0
Actual Revenue
$ 0
Valuation Gap
$ 0
Average billed $ 0
Achievable avg. bill $ 0

DESCRIPTION: This matrix visualization shows the property tax gap analysis across two dimensions: the number of properties (vertical axis from Compliant to Estimated) and the billing level (horizontal axis from average billed to achievable market-based billing). Each colored cell represents a different type of gap or revenue component. The same breakdown is also shown in the pie chart below.


Revenue and Administrative Gaps

DESCRIPTION: This pie chart illustrates the same information as the matrix above in percentage form. It shows the share of total potential revenue corresponding to the revenue actually collected, as well as the contribution of each type of administrative gap (uncollected or lost revenue) to that total.


Potential Revenue Breakdown (Actual Revenue + Adm. Gap breakdown)
Revenue & Administrative Gaps Amount ($) Share (%)
Revenue to date 0 0%
Compliance Gap 0 0%
Coverage Gap 0 0%
Valuation Gap 0 0%
Mixed Gap (val./cov. reg.) 0 0%
Mixed Gap (val./uncov. unreg.) 0 0%
TOTAL (Potential Revenue) 0 100%

Administrative Gap Breakdown ($)
Administrative Gaps Amount ($) Share (%)
Compliance Gap 0 0%
Coverage Gap 0 0%
Valuation/assessment Gap 0 0%
Mixed Gap (val./reg.) 0 0%
Mixed Gap (val./unreg.) 0 0%
Total Administrative Gap 0 100%
Breakdown of Administrative Gaps

DESCRIPTION: This pie chart illustrates the percentage distribution of the revenue gaps. It visually shows the contribution of each type of gap to the total uncollected revenue, helping to identify which gaps are the most significant.

Stream Prioritization

Step 1 of the Prioritization Pipeline: Rank revenue streams by their Total Functional Gap to determine which streams to tackle first. Include or exclude streams based on local priorities, capacity, or political considerations.

Adjustable Stream Prioritization
Default Rank Stream Name Total Functional Gap Include/Exclude Adjust Rank
Loading stream data from Gap Analysis...
Final Stream Prioritization
Final Rank Stream Name Total Functional Gap Share of Total Gap Status
Final rankings will appear after selecting streams above
Total Functional Gap by Stream

Complete Gap Analysis to see chart data

Share of Total Gap

Complete Gap Analysis to see chart data

Total Streams Analyzed

0

Streams Included

0

Total Gap (All)

-

Total Gap (Included)

-


Gap Prioritization

Step 2 of the Prioritization Pipeline: After ordering streams, prioritize gaps (Compliance, Coverage, Valuation/Liability) within each one. ROSRA suggests a default order based on compliance and coverage indicators; use the Adjust Priority columns to change the sequence or select "Remove" to drop a gap from your plan.

When Applied: Compliance Ratio ≥ 75%

High compliance usually indicates that the basic collection and registration systems are functioning. In this case, the priority is to focus on the functions with the largest monetary gaps, as these represent the biggest revenue gains for a given reform effort.

When Applied: Compliance Ratio < 75% AND Coverage Ratio ≥ 60%

A significant share of known taxpayers is not paying, but the register is not fundamentally broken. ROSRA recommends prioritising compliance reforms (billing, payment channels, enforcement), then coverage, and only then valuation/liability.

When Applied: Compliance Ratio < 75% AND Coverage Ratio < 60%

When both ratios are low, the missing tax base is usually the binding constraint. Strengthening enforcement alone has limited effect if most units are invisible to the administration. The recommended sequence is Coverage → Compliance → Valuation/Liability.

Gap Sequencing by Stream
Rank Stream Mode Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3
Include streams in Step 1 to see gap prioritization options
Gap Amounts by Priority
Rank Stream Priority 1 Amount 1 Priority 2 Amount 2 Priority 3 Amount 3
Gap amounts will appear after gap prioritization
Reform Sequence Summary
Total Streams
0
Total Gap Combinations
0
Removed Gaps
0
Active Gap Actions
0

First Priority Actions:
No actions defined yet
Master Priority List
# Stream Gap Amount
Master list will populate from gap priorities

Pick Solutions for All Gaps Across Prioritised Streams

Select or skip solution overviews for each administrative gap across all revenue streams in the priority order defined in the "Prioritization" tab.

0/0 reviewed | 0 selected | 0 skipped
Loading...

Loading solutions...

Your Selection Summary

No solutions selected yet.

Quick Actions

Recommended Solutions and Implementation Guidance

This tab provides detailed solution cards for the options you selected previously. Solutions appear according to the established prioritization order. Use these recommendations to create your city's tailored Revenue Enhancement Action Plan.

0 Solutions Selected
0 Quick Wins (<1 year)
0 Medium Term (1-3 years)
0 Long Term (3+ years)